Resistance 3 : new images

hansatan

Commented on 2010-12-23 16:14:32

Looks fine yet still its just resistance ;)

In reply to

GFreeman

Commented on 2010-12-23 16:18:23

Erm....those pics are not new...

In reply to

ManThatYouFear

Commented on 2010-12-23 16:19:00

it looks fine?
It looks shit hot.

In reply to

blmbox

Commented on 2010-12-23 16:46:06

Looks great to me; love the art style. The gameplay looks to be incredibly cinematic based on that gameplay trailer as well.

In reply to

This message and account have been deleted at the user's request

Xion4360

Commented on 2010-12-23 17:28:26

could have sworn i saw these images like a couple months ago

In reply to

OpiZA

Commented on 2010-12-23 17:35:40

Get a half life 2 vibe from the architecture, not a bad thing. Resistance 2 was pretty weak, but from the vid from VGA they seem to have stepped it up, I hope.

In reply to

johnc

Commented on 2010-12-23 17:39:33

Someboy already mentioned it, these are some of the first screens shown.
I bet it will be great in motion, but as some one already mentioned, the chimera models are really showing their age. they don't look that much better than Doom 3 models, almost.

In reply to

martin1841

Commented on 2010-12-23 17:41:00

face models looks great! :D

In reply to

Jollipop

Commented on 2010-12-23 17:42:35

Woud like to see them make something different now.

In reply to

PlumbDrumb

Commented on 2010-12-23 18:04:29 In reply to johnc

Posted by johnc

Someboy already mentioned it, these are some of the first screens shown.
I bet it will be great in motion, but as some one already mentioned, the chimera models are really showing their age. they don't look that much better than Doom 3 models, almost.

They trounce Doom 3 models.
Maybe not artistically, as these things have a bit of a "generic'ism" to them, but technically Doom3 is obviously far inferior.

In reply to

Frozpot

Commented on 2010-12-23 18:45:31

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=rs4dwn&s=5
http://media.photobucket.com/image/Doom%203%20mode...
http://www.pathguy.com/doom_3.jpg

I don't know, those Doom 3 models look pretty good, lol. They may not sport as many polys, but the models are still great. Of course the hard, dynamic shadows help make them pop a bit. I'd love to see those R3 models in with the Doom Lighting- probably'd look awesome...

In reply to

Xion4360

Commented on 2010-12-23 19:01:34

the trailer from the VGA's showed in-game stuff and it certainly looked nice in motion.

In reply to

Megido

Commented on 2010-12-23 19:03:29

Depending on how you look at it, Doom 3 was by far more impressive compared to it's competition when it hit and it still has some pretty damn good use of normal maps on low-poly meshes.

Somewhow i get the feeling that im looking at very smallt hings with these screens...the characters feel more like dolls than people/murderous savage aliens for some reason.

In reply to

PlumbDrumb

Commented on 2010-12-23 19:05:18 In reply to Frozpot

Posted by Frozpot

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=rs4dwn&s=5
http://media.photobucket.com/image/Doom%203%20mode...
http://www.pathguy.com/doom_3.jpg

I don't know, those Doom 3 models look pretty good, lol. They may not sport as many polys, but the models are still great. Of course the hard, dynamic shadows help make them pop a bit. I'd love to see those R3 models in with the Doom Lighting- probably'd look awesome...

It's a good looking game for sure, but I was more thinking of this guy (he has a somewhat similar design):

http://img827.imageshack.us/i/pic1br.jpg/

http://img696.imageshack.us/i/pic2wf.jpg/

I don't see this guy coming close to the fidelity of the Resistance 3 models

In reply to

KORNdog

Commented on 2010-12-23 19:19:55

these where the very first images released, like, 2 months ago.

In reply to

bleachedsmiles

Commented on 2010-12-23 19:36:03

i've not seen the last 3 pics before..so thanks for putting them up!

In reply to

jackdoe

Commented on 2010-12-23 21:53:21

The Resistance games have just been so depressing thematically, especially the second game where you get to the ending only to realize that everything you've done up to that point was not going to change the outcome of the invasion, at all.

Hopefully, this game ends on a slightly more chipper note, but I don't see how that would be possible based on the way the series plot has been developing.

In reply to

KORNdog

Commented on 2010-12-23 22:24:47 In reply to jackdoe

Posted by jackdoe

The Resistance games have just been so depressing thematically, especially the second game where you get to the ending only to realize that everything you've done up to that point was not going to change the outcome of the invasion, at all.

Hopefully, this game ends on a slightly more chipper note, but I don't see how that would be possible based on the way the series plot has been developing.

i'm hoping for the opposite. it'd be nice to see a game that doesnt have a "we fought and won" ending. it's getting a bit cliche'd. reach did it well, where the nobel team die and reach is taken by the covenant. it's not an upbeat ending. but it's more interesting then the nobel team fighting, kicking their ass and sending them packing where "everyone lives happily ever after".

reading about the game reminds me of "the road" tho with the whole - humanity has fallen, fighting to survive, people resorting to canibalism to carry on living etc. so i'm hoping something along the lines of that. major loss and desperation mixed in with a glimmer of hope.

In reply to

[quote=jackdoe]The Resistance games have just been so depressing thematically, especially the second game where you get to the ending only to realize that everything you've done up to that point was not going to change the outcome of the invasion, at all.

Hopefully, this game ends on a slightly more chipper note, but I don't see how that would be possible based on the way the series plot has been developing.[/quote]

i'm hoping for the opposite. it'd be nice to see a game that doesnt have a "we fought and won" ending. it's getting a bit cliche'd. reach did it well, where the nobel team die and reach is taken by the covenant. it's not an upbeat ending. but it's more interesting then the nobel team fighting, kicking their ass and sending them packing where "everyone lives happily ever after".

reading about the game reminds me of "the road" tho with the whole - humanity has fallen, fighting to survive, people resorting to canibalism to carry on living etc. so i'm hoping something along the lines of that. major loss and desperation mixed in with a glimmer of hope.

Xion4360

Commented on 2010-12-23 23:34:20 In reply to KORNdog

Posted by KORNdog

i'm hoping for the opposite. it'd be nice to see a game that doesnt have a "we fought and won" ending. it's getting a bit cliche'd. reach did it well, where the nobel team die and reach is taken by the covenant. it's not an upbeat ending. but it's more interesting then the nobel team fighting, kicking their ass and sending them packing where "everyone lives happily ever after".

reading about the game reminds me of "the road" tho with the whole - humanity has fallen, fighting to survive, people resorting to canibalism to carry on living etc. so i'm hoping something along the lines of that. major loss and desperation mixed in with a glimmer of hope.

I agree with you but theres another thing to take note.. for one Halo reach is a prequel, its end result was set in stone prior to the release. Resistance 2 already ended in such a fashion, for this to end in the same fashion being the third game would just make it feel like there is no hope for a positive outcome ever. it looks like the world and its people are as defeated as can be judging from the trailer, to fight in the game only to lose again wouldnt feel appropriate IMO

They could give you a rewarding victory at the end without locking out the possibility of further sequels.

In reply to

[quote=KORNdog]

i'm hoping for the opposite. it'd be nice to see a game that doesnt have a "we fought and won" ending. it's getting a bit cliche'd. reach did it well, where the nobel team die and reach is taken by the covenant. it's not an upbeat ending. but it's more interesting then the nobel team fighting, kicking their ass and sending them packing where "everyone lives happily ever after".

reading about the game reminds me of "the road" tho with the whole - humanity has fallen, fighting to survive, people resorting to canibalism to carry on living etc. so i'm hoping something along the lines of that. major loss and desperation mixed in with a glimmer of hope.[/quote]

I agree with you but theres another thing to take note.. for one Halo reach is a prequel, its end result was set in stone prior to the release. Resistance 2 already ended in such a fashion, for this to end in the same fashion being the third game would just make it feel like there is no hope for a positive outcome ever. it looks like the world and its people are as defeated as can be judging from the trailer, to fight in the game only to lose again wouldnt feel appropriate IMO

They could give you a rewarding victory at the end without locking out the possibility of further sequels.

gow_fan

Commented on 2010-12-24 20:15:40

Not every game needs to have OMG best gfx. It will be fine, little gameplay video they released was good

In reply to

Frozpot

Commented on 2010-12-26 19:53:43 In reply to gow_fan

Posted by gow_fan

Not every game needs to have OMG best gfx. It will be fine, little gameplay video they released was good

I think that's the main issue though. The first two were "fine", what we want is "great". There is nothing really wrong with the graphics, what I want is a game that is more fun and interesting to play. The PS3 controller pisses me off for FPS's though...

In reply to

Megido

Commented on 2010-12-27 01:56:47 In reply to Frozpot

Posted by Frozpot

I think that's the main issue though. The first two were "fine", what we want is "great". There is nothing really wrong with the graphics, what I want is a game that is more fun and interesting to play. The PS3 controller pisses me off for FPS's though...

yeah, i agree, the triggers are awful and i keep slipping off of the analog nubs. I don't understand why they haven't amde them a more rubbery-type material and for the love of god, is it too much to ask to make them concave?

As for the game, my afore mentioned gripe about it for some reason looing more like action figures than people/monsters is still present, but i think it looks alright none the less. I've seen worse to be sure. I only played the first game though, but it thought it was AWFUL. Graphics were kind of bad for such a big title (expecially textures in some areas) and the gameplay was incredibly unengaging to me. As a result i never even considered getting part 2 and seeing as how i've not heard much about it since release, i expect i haven't missed out on much? This doesn't exactly get me fired up for the next installment for obvious reasons :P

In reply to

[quote=Frozpot]
I think that's the main issue though.  The first two were "fine", what we want is "great".  There is nothing really wrong with the graphics, what I want is a game that is more fun and interesting to play. The PS3 controller pisses me off for FPS's though...[/quote]

yeah, i agree, the triggers are awful and i keep slipping off of the analog nubs. I don't understand why they haven't amde them a more rubbery-type material and for the love of god, is it too much to ask to make them concave?

As for the game, my afore mentioned gripe about it for some reason looing more like action figures than people/monsters is still present, but i think it looks alright none the less. I've seen worse to be sure. I only played the first game though, but it thought it was AWFUL. Graphics were kind of bad for such a big title (expecially textures in some areas) and the gameplay was incredibly unengaging to me. As a result i never even considered getting part 2 and seeing as how i've not heard much about it since release, i expect i haven't missed out on much? This doesn't exactly get me fired up for the next installment for obvious reasons :P

Frozpot

Commented on 2010-12-27 08:57:46

It's the lack of triggers, and the HUGE dead zone in the middle of the sticks for me...

In reply to

presstheflesh

Commented on 2010-12-28 16:42:00 In reply to Frozpot

Posted by Frozpot

It's the lack of triggers, and the HUGE dead zone in the middle of the sticks for me...

a myth carried over from dualshock2 the dead zone in dualshock 3's are tiny. not too mention dualshock 3 analogue stick precision is 10bit not 8bit compared to 360/ps2 (1024 discrete steps vs 256) which translates into smoother crosshair movement.

In reply to

Resistance 3 : new images

5 screenshots

All comments (28)

Dynasty Warriors Origins

Kingdom Come: Deliverance II

Assassin's Creed Shadows

Slitterhead demo now available

Our PS5 Pro video of Zenless Zone Zero

Our PC video of Go Home Annie