Secret Service announced

Commented on 2008-10-11 13:31:00

playstation 2 and not 3, HA! that's funny :)

In reply to

Commented on 2008-10-11 13:53:21

Funny yet somehow not surprising. Dead Rising went to the family-friendly Wii but not PS3. Sony just can't catch a break this gen.

In reply to

Bobby7777

Commented on 2008-10-11 13:57:33

That first image makes me a bit dizzy!

In reply to

Doctor_Hades

Commented on 2008-10-11 14:03:55

Looks very mediocre visually... are you sure these are 360 screenshots and not PS2 ones?

In reply to

Kukuk

Commented on 2008-10-11 14:11:42

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

The developers must not be skilled enough to make PS3 games.

LittleBigMe

Commented on 2008-10-11 14:48:53

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Really appreciable, its funny and appreciating at the same time to see a game yet again released for !!"PS2"!!, Voila!!!

Its great to see PS2 having such long legs and great life, having said that, I remember how original xbox fanboys used to talk competition, and press totally supporting xbox, funny indeed, and even more than that: ironic!

Is that story going to be repeated again?

LittleBigMe

Commented on 2008-10-11 14:52:42 In reply to broman

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Posted by broman

Funny yet somehow not surprising. Dead Rising went to the family-friendly Wii but not PS3. Sony just can't catch a break this gen.

Come on, such underwhelming visuals for a next-gen 360 game to be, should stay as far away from PS3 as possible. Heh, devs' underpowerment shouldn't be carried over to iconic systems.

Burglarize

Commented on 2008-10-11 15:17:34 In reply to Doctor_Hades

Posted by Doctor_Hades

Looks very mediocre visually... are you sure these are 360 screenshots and not PS2 ones?

Did you even read the description?!

It's a budget game, they're not going for graphics.

Also, I suggest you turn on your PS2 (if you even have one) and check the graphics, because they do not look as good as this game, as mediocre as it is.

In reply to

szaromir

Commented on 2008-10-11 15:20:23 In reply to LittleBigMe

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Posted by LittleBigMe

Come on, such underwhelming visuals for a next-gen 360 game to be, should stay as far away from PS3 as possible. Heh, devs' underpowerment shouldn't be carried over to iconic systems.

Did you marry your PS3?

bleachedsmiles

Commented on 2008-10-11 15:21:36 In reply to LittleBigMe

Posted by LittleBigMe

Come on, such underwhelming visuals for a next-gen 360 game to be, should stay as far away from PS3 as possible. Heh, devs' underpowerment shouldn't be carried over to iconic systems.

ps3 iconic system? i think you mean "cult" system... as in, few own it.

And the difference between the ps2 and xbox was that the ps2 hit earlier, was cheaper, and was less techically advanced than the xbox...sound familiar?

I do agree though.. ps3 owners wouldn't even want this..they should start putting these kind of budget games through xbox live though. Rather than keep rehashing retro games that nostalgia has made us believe were way better than they actually are.

In reply to

LittleBigMe

Commented on 2008-10-11 15:35:21 In reply to bleachedsmiles

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Posted by bleachedsmiles

ps3 iconic system? i think you mean "cult" system... as in, few own it.

And the difference between the ps2 and xbox was that the ps2 hit earlier, was cheaper, and was less techically advanced than the xbox...sound familiar?

Heh:), I don't think 'few' own it, its twice the price of 360,
came out after a whole year of 360(actually 1 and a half year after it in Europe), currently the HD console leader in Japan,
only a few thousand behind 360 in europe(a shame as 360 came a whole year and a half before PS3 in Europe),
already oversold 360 in France :) :) :),
only in confrontation in america, and still outselling 360 there the whole past year-------
I don't see 360 even standing a chance if it had not gone for 2 consecutive price-cuts and bought 3 Rpgs.

Whatever, that went way off topic, but you got the point ;).

ON_TOPIC: its glad to see a PS2 game still being made(even when the so called formidable competition is long dead ;)--- but seriously, they should not port it to any HD system.

DvT

Commented on 2008-10-11 15:36:47

Looks well, cool idea.

In reply to

FreeSwag

Commented on 2008-10-11 17:00:00

Looking over this thread, Gamersyde is really beginning to go downhill. So much for the rules of checking fanboy attitudes at the door.

In reply to

KORNdog

Commented on 2008-10-11 17:31:23

wow, whatever version those screens are from it looks pretty crappy to me.

In reply to

spacemanjupiter

Commented on 2008-10-11 17:37:09

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

for the PS3 being more complex mechanically(and harder to program), more expensive, and a thousand times more hyped, multiplatform games usually run smoother and look slightly better on the 360. now THAT is FUNNY! I kept telling people the 360 was going to be the better hardware.

So you get a system that is much easier to program, easier to port to and from, more memory, better gpu, and games that run and look a bit better. Easier, Cheaper, Better. Now do you wonder why they chose not to make a PS3 version? :)

KORNdog

Commented on 2008-10-11 17:48:35 In reply to spacemanjupiter

This message is in "Boulet Time" (TM), If you still *really* want to see it, click here

Posted by spacemanjupiter

for the PS3 being more complex mechanically(and harder to program), more expensive, and a thousand times more hyped, multiplatform games usually run smoother and look slightly better on the 360. now THAT is FUNNY! I kept telling people the 360 was going to be the better hardware.

So you get a system that is much easier to program, easier to port to and from, more memory, better gpu, and games that run and look a bit better. Easier, Cheaper, Better. Now do you wonder why they chose not to make a PS3 version? :)

i cant believe a game as z-list and crappy looking as this is sparking a fanboy argument....hahaha.

Tinks

Commented on 2008-10-11 18:49:33

For a budget game this doesn't look half bad (it's budget)
Given who is making it, it's sure to be fun as well

In reply to

BLackHawkodst

Commented on 2008-10-11 20:06:56

LOL just wow to this thread let me check who ignited the fanboy wars , ah yes that makes sense him again.

As Cooleo said, this is a budget game so its not going for AAA graphics, sounds intersting will wait to hear more.

In reply to

senators2904

Commented on 2008-10-11 20:26:29

when looking at these broke ass screens its obvious that the devs for this game are too damn lazy to work with the ps3.

In reply to

GangStarr

Commented on 2008-10-11 22:44:48

i think the game looks pretty good, very clean and nice :)

In reply to

Stoffinator

Commented on 2008-10-11 23:18:28

How odd is that. 360 and PS2. That little black machine just won't die.

In reply to

GangStarr

Commented on 2008-10-11 23:24:08

oh btw heard it was gonna be half price? nice one

also i think they are releasing it on the PS2 rather then the PS3 because PS2 has more users then the PS3(more chances of sales) so its only sensible for a budget game

if this game can run on a PS2 then i dont aspect anything unique about the gameplay or AI or whatever but for £20-25 might be worth playin.

In reply to