face2papalocust @GTB: A vomir. (il y a 7 Heures)
GTB Pour info, toutes les features online de TopSpin'25 ne seront assuré que jusqu'à fin 2026. (il y a 8 Heures)
comette La série et bonne rien à dire (il y a 10 Heures)
Soda Déjà 65 millions de téléspectateurs pour la série Fallout ! Je recommande ;) (il y a 16 Heures)
Driftwood @reneyvane: avec des mauviettes et du fumier ? (il y a 3 Jours)
Driftwood Il est de nouveau possible de télécharger les vidéos sur le site. Désolé pour le mois et demi de panne. (il y a > 3 Mois)
Driftwood Retrouvez notre review de Rift Apart dès 16h00 aujourd'hui, mais en attendant Guilty Gear -Strive- est en vedette en home ! (il y a > 3 Mois)
Driftwood Nouveau live sur Returnal à 14h30 aujourd'hui. (il y a > 3 Mois)
Driftwood Rendez-vous à 17h00 pour un direct de 40 minutes sur Returnal (il y a > 3 Mois)
if you used a capture card to capture PS4 footage however, no such restrictions would exist because it essentially becomes more like fraps, only it's hardware instead of software. but it's still independent of the console and any outside control.
unless PC becomes a closed platform, it will never be able to control what you can and can't capture from your screen in regards to gaming or anything.
now, what is illegal is the download of a pirated copy of a game. THAT is against the law. that's where the legalities start and end in the situation you just gave.
now, you could ask "how would someone know if the footage you'd captured of a game was from a legally purchased copy or of a illegally downloaded copy?" and the answer most of the time is 'they wouldn't'
some developers put in specific visual "defects" as a form of anti piracy which would give the game away. for instance. quantum break had the player character wear an eye patch if the game was pirated. if that was recorded there is a clear visual identifier that the copy was illegally obtained. but the actual act of recording the game wouldn't even factor into the legalities aside from the way you ended up getting caught for piracy.