About the game
- Batman: Arkham City
- PC, X360, PS3
- Published by Warner Bros. Int...
- Developed by Rocksteady Studios
- French release: Available
- US release: Available
What's up?

Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL
Log in
Express links
- Microsoft launches Xbox Wire
- CI Games unveils Lords of the Fallen (Next-gen/PC/2014)
- EA abandons the online pass
- Ubisoft indefinitely suspends production on 1666 after firing Patrice Desilets
- EA opens new DICE studio in Los Angeles
- Disney and EA announce multi-year Star Wars games agreement
- Rumor: Internal Microsoft memo says Next Xbox works without internet
- Bethesda Softworks teases a new game
- Australian classification board lists Pacific Rim game
- Why the next-generation of game design has to happen
- 2K Games won't have a booth at this year's E3
- Nintendo skips E3 conference, games & events still there
- Next Xbox will be revealed on May 21
- SCEA registers 'The Order: 1886'
- The Bureau (XCOM shooter) to be re-revealed on April 26

All comments
I have to admit, she is hot!
http://images.gamersyde.com/image_batman_arkham_city-19112-2101_0003.jpg
I have to admit, she is hot!
I still have a ton of stuff to do in B:AC, but i have no desire to return to it. It was just incredibly dissapointing compared to first..., being able to play as nancy boy robin isnt going to change that.
I don't understand how this is a disappointment compared to the first....
clusterfuck of random cameo villains that served only to make the narrative messy. open world removed the metroidvania approach of the first, and again, made it less focused, fell back on open world staples like random enemy encounters (lame) . traversing the city was tiresome and became a chore to get from point A-B once the novelty wore off. combat and stealth where barely improved upon outside of a few tweaks here and there. story wasnt as good, and the ending was just lame. riddler trophies were more numerous, but more repetative and boring to acomplish. it basically did exactly what i thought it was going to do when i heard about them going open-world. i was hopeing they would somehow retain the feel of the first while having an open world to set the scene, but instead we got a pretty by the numbers open world experience complete with all the things that makes those games a chore. it was still an OK game, but unlike the first, i do regret buying it, wish i'd have rented it instead.
There's something called a receipt, if you don't like it, send it back.
a receipt doesnt take away the dissapointment, you may get your money back, but you'll never get your time back.
clusterfuck of random cameo villains that served only to make the narrative messy. open world removed the metroidvania approach of the first, and again, made it less focused, fell back on open world staples like random enemy encounters (lame) . traversing the city was tiresome and became a chore to get from point A-B once the novelty wore off. combat and stealth where barely improved upon outside of a few tweaks here and there. story wasnt as good, and the ending was just lame. riddler trophies were more numerous, but more repetative and boring to acomplish. it basically did exactly what i thought it was going to do when i heard about them going open-world. i was hopeing they would somehow retain the feel of the first while having an open world to set the scene, but instead we got a pretty by the numbers open world experience complete with all the things that makes those games a chore. it was still an OK game, but unlike the first, i do regret buying it, wish i'd have rented it instead.
If your time is so important, go out and do something with it instead of complaining about video games.
sorry Korndog if ur time is limited like mine now days, don't need to finish the whole game, especially when u don't like it that much, personally i can't say anything about the game, as i havan't played it yet, i was planning to get it, but hearing ur dissapointment, i maight get max pain 3 instead.