| Forums-> Main forum-> Burnout 5 interview - video: |
| Author | Message |
| Martijn_ Since 1406 Days |
2007-02-15 00:12:55 Burnout 5 interview - video http://www.gametrailers.com/gamepage.php?id=4419 |
| ManThatYouFear Since 1479 Days |
2007-02-15 11:51:32 as long as it is more like 1-2 :D they went downhill after that :( --- |
| Enolc Since 1124 Days |
2007-02-15 14:33:14 I've only played 3, but everything I've ever heard was that the first 2 sucked and that they only got good at 3. --- |
| SimonM7 Since 1559 Days |
2007-02-15 14:36:11 In reply to Enolc (2007-02-15 14:33:14) Burnout 2 is so the best, you should throw pies at the ones that told you that. --- |
| JediMasterMalik Since 1271 Days |
2007-02-15 14:47:55 I loved 2, 3 was great aswell. Never bought 4 though. |
| ManThatYouFear Since 1479 Days |
2007-02-15 16:02:13 In reply to Enolc (2007-02-15 14:33:14) Posted by Enolc I've only played 3, but everything I've ever heard was that the first 2 sucked and that they only got good at 3. --- |
| Martijn_ Since 1406 Days |
2007-02-15 19:07:33 To be honest 3 sucked, graphically it was great but for the gameplay serious crap. |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1536 Days |
2007-02-16 02:21:53 In reply to ManThatYouFear (2007-02-15 16:02:13) Posted by ManThatYouFear You my good man should be shot. |
| SimonM7 Since 1559 Days |
2007-02-16 02:22:53 I thought one of the main problems with 3 was that not even crashing really had much of an impact on whether you won or not. Boost was totally generous and you barely needed to do anything to get enough to boost back to the lead. --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1536 Days |
2007-02-16 02:27:28 In reply to SimonM7 (2007-02-16 02:22:53) Posted by SimonM7 Burnout 2 was about skillful driving, not fucking takedowns. Grr. |
| SimonM7 Since 1559 Days |
2007-02-16 02:45:51 But there was no combat in 1 and 2. There wasn't even a proper collision model for the competing cars. --- |
| GriftGFX He can also ban your ass! Since 1536 Days |
2007-02-16 03:29:45 In reply to SimonM7 (2007-02-16 02:45:51) Posted by SimonM7 But there was no combat in 1 and 2. There wasn't even a proper collision model for the competing cars. And scoring X14 burnouts was not about combat nor a good line, it was about reflexes and great drifting skills. |
| ManThatYouFear Since 1479 Days |
2007-02-16 11:22:51 In reply to GriftGFX (2007-02-16 02:21:53) Posted by GriftGFX That's a bit harsh. I agree that the first two games were in general better, but I still think that both three and four were decent games as well. I actually like three a good deal--and my only problem with Revenge is that dodging traffic is sorta not that necessary when you can basically plow through everyone. --- |
| SimonM7 Since 1559 Days |
2007-02-16 12:34:34 In reply to GriftGFX (2007-02-16 03:29:45) Depends I guess, do you simply want to do the race and progress through the game or do you want to rack up the big scores? Either way, the ease with which you do stuff in 2 is dumbed down to near-pointlessness in the two sequels. The way the boost meter works and the way traffic works has you winning all the time. --- |
| ManThatYouFear Since 1479 Days |
2007-02-16 14:07:17 Burnout 3 was good, you cant deny it of that, but compared to that previous 2 it did blow fat chunks of cosmos poo. --- |
| Forums-> Main forum-> Burnout 5 interview - video: |
You have to be logged in to post in this forum!
Log in
- 7 Just Cause 2 in March
- 2 Splatterhouse bloody images
- 2 Avatar multiplayer video
- 15 Bayonetta: Transformations
- 21 Serious Sam HD final trailer
- 17 Crackdown 2 images
- 36 Battlefield Moments episode 2
Top stories
About
- Copyright 2007-2009 Gamersyde SARL